Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-61.6.238.10-20161107022633/@comment-25893909-20170209121328

Aggression25 wrote:

Mustavi Sadi Aryan wrote:

Islandboss wrote: Aggression25 wrote:

Mustavi Sadi Aryan wrote:

Aggression25 wrote:

Mustavi Sadi Aryan wrote:

Aggression25 wrote:

Islandboss wrote:

Mustavi Sadi Aryan wrote: Aggression25 wrote: He did kill Crablante, right? Before he became powerful? With only a tie. indirectly killed people when he knocked down the brawn brother There's no such thing as a perfect hero, and always such a cruel way to call the loss of life collateral damage. And I thought Superman was the only one who indirectly killed people. Nope. Remember the early Batman films with Michael Keaton? He caused the Joker to fall to his death and incapacitated the Penguin to the point of death. Oh, right. And to think Batman would ultimately kill people in BvS and end up being the best Batman of all time. Part of the reason Batman was permitted to kill in the older films was because the tone was darker, so he had to be darker.

I've yet to see BvS, but I was told it was impressive. BvS is a piece of shit fam. It really is retarded and the film is the equal of click bait. And DONT YOU DARE SAY THAT HES THE BEST BATMAN. By far the best batman is christian bale  I didn't like Bale that much. Ben Affleck really did the job great. His combat skills, his attitude as Batman and his daily life was close enough to the comics than Bale ever was. And don't forget Batfleck's combat skills, which are comparable to the comics and the Arkham series of video games. A darker Batman is what we needed.

Either way, everyone has their own opinions. Other than that, BvS really wasn't great, except for the Ultimate Edition, but it still doesn't fill that many expectations. I actually liked Michael Keaton's Batman back in the day. I like Keaton too, as his dark version of Batman really made it good for his impression.