Talk:Lord Boros/@comment-107.188.180.84-20151026083043/@comment-107.188.181.229-20151101162528

What that explanation made by the DC universe means simply to me, is that I wasn't the first / only one to make the objection about the "limitless" nature of Superman's power. I mena, sure you technically can write a character and world to be any way you want them to be, but not everyone will accept that in order for things to sell, sometimes you have to bend your "vision" just a bit. Much like back when Superman had absolutely NO weakness in the very early comics, he got boring to everybody and stop selling and almost went under completely, but was saved when they finally came up for a weakness for him. In that same respect, you are allowed to assert that your character is as strong as however you say you are, untill you give him/her definite parameters of the allocation of their power. Basically, the moment Superman had his power source and physiology explained, was the very same moment that in terms of reality, the rules and properties of said source are also made to apply...at least as far as I'm concerned. As an astrophysicist, I cannot accept an assertion that a power  source (in this case stars) would have literally infinite energy, such an implication would invalidate the very fundamental nature of the entire universe he inhabits. Literally anything having infinite energy, would lead to an overall collapse of just about all of spaccetime, the universe couldn't possibly exist in a stable state, though more likely if it were like that from the start, it would be plausible to say that the big bang would have never happened, at least in a way that we understand it.

Finally, if you disagree with all that, I don't necessarily mind that, but I will make a final assertion that in a crossover, one cannot fully apply all the laws or their constituent universes, if it is inherently different from each other.