Talk:Saitama/@comment-108.28.94.13-20160906051219/@comment-26053517-20160924153010

No. No. and NO.

he is not the strongest. just possibly(if removing his limiter gave him infinite strength which is likely not the case as dr genus said it was about growth limit) one of physically strongest. there are characters that make saitama look no different than an ordirany microbe. characters that have conceptual manipulation powers. can saitama change history of infinite universes with a punch ? No. can saitama punch the concept of baldness ? No. Can he get out the story(wtf) and just rewrite it as he pleases as some bullshit characters can do? no. etc.. So being in the league of  low level actual god characters is out of the window. Also being a parody of some character does not make you stonger then them in any way.

Having hardly exploitable weaknesses is irrelevant if 3 of them fought.

saitama is, as far as the evidence shows him to be, at max a star-destroyer. Using no limits fallacy in a debate is, as the name suggests, a fallacy.

Getting killed by laser of unknown power does not show someone is weak.

Geryuganshoop never created a black hole. he just made a gravity field which light escaped. even the metal ground was supporting the weight caused by the field. and ability to create a real black hole would put  Geryuganshoop leagues above Boros who can planet bust by giving away all of his energy.

Saitama by feats is ,as of right now, at the same level as superman and goku physically. but goku is far above them in energy attacks-resistance. only disadvantage goku has is need to channel ki to be durable.

And saitama is strongest in his universe. He is meant to beat his universes enemies not much stronger universes. just like this :

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/6/60791/3918363-new+avengers+v3+020-014.jpg

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/6/60791/3918364-new+avengers+v3+020-015.jpg

people need to get this. saitama is not the strongest character.not even close. he is strongest in HİS universe.