Talk:Saitama/@comment-26868134-20160928174352/@comment-26868134-20161004153414

By parody I meant a comedy show with no logic.But parodies can have sone sort of logic that's what I meant by serious parody.In case you have not read what I said if according to you if he can destroy multiverse by a sneeze it doesn't matter.You can't apply logic to illogical subject.No one cares if tom and jerry destroy the universe.Akiro toriyama can write a story in which goku gets defeated by saitama and becomes so enraged that he becomes omnipotent and deletes saitama forever.No one will give a shit about that at all.That joke will not even be funny.That is why people don't compare parody which do not follow any logic with comics that follow some comic logic.

Saitama does follow a logic known as fun and if they make his power infinite the fun factor will be gone for most people except fanboys like you.People like powerful characters but not too much powerful characters.There is reason superman has kryptonite,red suns etc.People wait which character can defeat saitam even when they know he will never be defeated.I know that is whole point of show is a guy that defeats everyone one by a punch.but if everyonehas confirmation that a character has a automatic I win button they are not going to watch it.Why do you think saitama did not kill boros with one punch as usual even if he was capable of doing it?And please don't say that he didn't used his power even boros says he had much strength to spare.Just imagine if he had finished the fight with one punch.How much fun it would have been?They just want people wondering about his strength so that they keep interested in a show.At end I would say what saitama would have said:

"Having infinite power is utterly boring "