Thread:Spartan1204/@comment-26635429-20150831210148/@comment-3544775-20150902234925

^ I have to agree. Just opened the wiki and I couldn't recognize it (and not in a good way).

A few things that at first glance make it look like a step down from previous design:
 * user pages info field is unreadable (number of edits, join date, I live in, etc)
 * the background is lame and practically unexistable, due to the only visible part being the sides which are strange lines and the rest is behind content area, and unless you check what is the image, you may not even recognize it.
 * the wordmark is a step down (not because I made the previous), because it have no style and very plain made for 15 seconds with unstyled "Wikia" text. If at least tried to imitate OPM font (which is very simple and easy to imitate), it would have been fine.
 * the header images on the main page looks weird/out of place.

No offence to the one who made it, but visually overall for me it feels a step down from before.