Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24319911-20160701130131/@comment-47.44.81.114-20180401054035

Well, from reading this thread, a lot of people like the 'memory loss', 'relative', 'time travel', and 'fellow limit breaker' theories. Me, I like the time travel theory, though no one has yet given this version of the idea from what I see:

"Blast is Saitama from the future, yet it is part of an arc. Instead of being a Saitama from the future that stays around, I think there will be an arc where Saitama is sent around 20 years into the past, where the whole arc is about Saitama finding a way back and meeting all of the young heroes, including rescuing Tatsumaki.

The only reason he has hair is because of a quirk from the time traveling, which could be played for laughs, so Saitama can have hair in the past, but he loses it when he returns to the future."

This is just my take on it though, so if anything can be disproven, I am willing to listen.

I just don't like the 'memory loss' or 'relative' angle. And the 'fellow limit breaker' theory only works for me if Blast and Saitama are equal power because 'infinite=infinite'. So no Blast > Saitama or Saitama > Blast for me.