Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-31724751-20170529101655/@comment-31724751-20170602160640

"Besides that (though granted, I have not watched these shows), I can take down that "no limit fallacy" with one word.  Presentation . " you clearly dont know what a no limit fallacy is. You CANT assume the strenght, speed, power etc. of anything if it was never shown or stated. Saitama is as strong as he has shown, until shown otherwise. otherwise, I can just say Goku is the strongest, because you cant prove that current Goku isn't infinitely strong, we have never seen CURRENT goku's full strength. Because I am not the author, I can't know what his limits are, we go with what was shown, and saitama was never shown to destroy anything more than a metoer. he scales to planet level Boros, that is it. Saying anything more than this is wank.

You are talking as if you are in fact the author.

"Overall, it is how the author wants to present the characters, and Saitama, being the titular protagonist and a parody character on superheroes, is intended to be stronger than them, enough so to survive breathing in space without any consequences happening (so it's not a "red herring." Don't try to use those words since they can easily be attacked.). "

Do you have any proof of this? I can say the exact about any character in fiction actually. Also dont think you know what red herring is,i wasnt talking about how long he can breathe, you arguing about this IS a red herring, it has NO relevance to my arguments.

"Popeye wasn't intended to be that overpowered joke character. " Yes of course, destroying the moon is not something a an overpowered character would do. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Also PROVE what was INTENDED with him. PROVE IT.

"Arale can probably be beaten by Goku." And I say she probably can't. And even if so, then what? PROVE she can.

"Zen-Oh is supposed to be God. " And he is still a joke character. LOook at his design.

"The Eds are supposed to be a trio hungry for the taste of jawbreakers, Eddy leading the group to that satisfaction by scamming people of their money." Which means what, they arent' joke characters? they are absolutely serious in every single way imaginable?

"So yeah. Overall, I still think Saitama is stronger because the story's canon wants to present Saitama in that light. "

You are not the author, so you dont know what his intention are.

"Goku is instead supposed to be a dude like Saitama but has a foreseeable limit before he breaks his newly-reached limits. Just my opinion for these reasons." You are not the author so you dont know what the author's intention are.

I see all this " saitama strongest in fiktion" is based on assumption and no limit fallacy.